Kraft Group Not Revisiting Plans for a Casino in Foxborough; Dismisses ‘False’ Reports

The Kraft Group refuted reports in Thursday's Foxboro Reporter and Sun Chronicle saying the company may be looking to revisit plans for a casino if proposed zoning changes are approved by the town's voters.

The Kraft Group delivered a clear message Thursday to anyone concerned the company’s pursuit of zoning changes to property along Route 1 could reopen the possibility of a casino coming to Foxborough.

“We are not pursuing a casino,” said Jeff Cournoyer, spokesman for The Kraft Group. “We are honoring the town’s position on that, as we said we would from the very beginning.”

Voters said “no” to the possibility of a casino being developed across from Gillette Stadium on Route 1 in Foxborough at May’s Town Election after months of heated debate over whether or not the proposal should even be heard. Following the May 7 election, the Kraft Group responded with the following statement on Tuesday, May 8:

“When the Commonwealth of Massachusetts passed gaming legislation, we brought forth an opportunity with the unquestioned premier developer and operator in the industry. We have the greatest respect for Steve Wynn, his team and his business model, and believe this unique opportunity was worthy of a chance to be heard. With Monday’s election, we believe the citizens of Foxborough have spoken. As we originally committed, we have heard them and respect their collective voice. With that democratic statement, as opposed to the voices of five individuals, we will be suspending our efforts regarding a destination resort development. We thank all of the residents who reached out and participated in a dialogue about the future of the town and thank Wynn Resorts for their interest in Foxborough.”

On Thursday, reports surfaced in the Foxboro Reporter and Sun Chronicle suggesting zoning changes proposed by the Kraft Group to the Planning Board last week could lead to the company revisiting plans to build a casino if approved.

Cournoyer called those reports “irresponsible” and “false.”

“Had the reporter [of the article in the Reporter and Sun Chronicle] bothered to contact us to ask that simple question, we would have told him [we are not pursuing a casino], like we have every time someone has asked since we announced that we were ending our efforts on the Wynn Foxborough development,” Cournoyer said. “Unfortunately, we weren’t given that opportunity.”

The article in question was written by Frank Mortimer and published in both the Foxboro Reporter and The Sun Chronicle Thursday morning.

To read Mortimer’s article, “Zoning Sounds Casino Alarms” in Thursday’s Foxboro Reporter, click here. To read Mortimer’s article, “Zoning Request Sounds Foxboro Alarms,” click here.

William Grieder, vice chairman of Foxborough’s Planning Board, reportedly told Mortimer the Kraft Group’s Oct. 11 presentation on zoning changes “led people concerned about casino items to wonder if the company is ‘just continuing to lay the groundwork for that to be revisited,’” according to Mortimer’s story.

Cournoyer said Thursday that statement could not be further from the truth.

“This is a false controversy and anyone who is fueling it is acting irresponsibly,” Cournoyer said, adding the Planning Board requested the Kraft Group submit suggested zoning changes, which was done at last week’s meeting with nothing “new” or controversial being presented.

“The proposed changes are the same as they have been dating back to before the Wynn [casino] proposal,” Cournoyer said. “They contain no language regarding gaming and would have no effect on town zoning bylaws that prohibit gaming. The Planning Board knows this.”

Cournoyer also refuted Mortimer’s claim that neither the Kraft Group representatives nor Planning Board members provided an answer to “several in the audience” who asked if these “proposals included the ability to have a casino.”

“The reporter who wrote [the article published in the Reporter and Sun Chronicle] was not even at [last week’s Planning Board meeting] on which the story was based and the result is a poor reflection of the events,” Cournoyer said, adding Kraft Group representatives offered an example of what type of “resort” the company was looking to develop on Route 1.

“At [last week’s Planning Board] meeting, when asked to elaborate on language in the documents that reference resort, conference and entertainment uses, our representative used Great Wolf Lodge as an example of a type of ‘resort’ that would feature family-friendly amenities and activities, lodging, conference space, etc.,” Cournoyer said. “Therefore, we did address the questions that were raised at the meeting, unlike what the [reporter suggests.”

For those unfamiliar with Great Wolf Lodge, it is the largest chain of indoor water park resorts with 11 locations nationwide – none in Massachusetts, according to its website. Click here for more information on Great Wolf Lodge.

Despite Thursday’s reports and Tuesday’s news that the Foxborough Board of Selectmen have dissolved the town’s negotiating committee with the Kraft Group because it was subject to open meeting law, the company remains optimistic that it can work closely with the town to further develop Patriot Place and Route 1.

“We are following the town’s process to seek zoning changes that would allow us to continue to develop Patriot Place in a way that will be consistent with or complementary to our existing development,” said Cournoyer.

Note: This article will be updated after Town Planner Sharon Wason has been successfully reached for comment.

Shannon Sylvia October 19, 2012 at 12:00 PM
This is the type of irresponsible reporting that we have come to expect from the Foxboro Reporter and the Sun Chronicle. Thank goodness we have the Foxboro Patch to read the real news, an accurate representation of what actually happened. The Foxboro Reporter should now publish a front page apology next week. They have taken journalism to an all time low, and no one can trust what they publish (especially from the author of that article).
Deborah A Stewart October 19, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Jeremie, I don't even know where to start after reading this article. It was irresponsible for the Foxboro Reporter to allow an article to be published with merely hearsay. If in fact the reporter was unable to attend the Planning Board meeting and was reporting a conversation he had with Mr Grieder, then that should have been clearly stated in the article. It is neither factual nor concise, something many of us have complained about in the past. I very much appreciate the Patch's reporting as well as the fact you do make sure you print the "facts" and not just an opinion. I believe I have said in the past that it is nice to see that you have gone above and beyond to make sure you get it right. Thank you so much for being the breath of fresh air we have needed for a very long time.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »