Who Will Run for Kerry's Seat if He's Appointed Secretary of Defense?
Would it be Scott Brown? Congressmen Markey or Capuano? Tell us who you think should run.
The Washington Post is reporting that President Obama is considering appointing Massachusetts U.S. Sen. John Kerry as the Secretary of Defense. There was speculation Kerry would be the next Secretary of State.
Either way Kerry's move to possibly become a member of Obama's cabinet will open up his current seat. Should he be appointed, a special election would be held to finish out Kerry's term, which expires in 2014.
Conversation from the breakfast table this morning to the morning commute has everyone talking - who will run for Kerry's U.S. Senate seat if he's appointed? Could it be Scott Brown? Or maybe Congressmen Ed Markey or Michael Capuano?
Only time will tell, but we know you're talking about it. So tell us, who do you think will run for Kerry's seat if he's appointed? Let us know in the comments section below.
Justin Braga
1:19 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
I hope Scott Brown runs for that seat. Massachusetts made a huge mistake in my opinion by voting out someone who was considered the 2nd most bipartisan senator in favor of Elizabeth Warren, who I feel will simply vote however Harry Reid tells her to vote. People say that they wish things would get done in Washington and that people need to work together. That is why I am so baffled that Scott Brown was not reelected.
Roger
4:56 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Governor Patrick will run for Kerrys seat and WIN How come He was not offered a Cabinet Job Hmmmmmm
Frank DelVecchio
10:35 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I'm tired of the Elizabeth Warren as lapdog talking point. There is absolutely nothing in her life history that suggests that will be the case.
R. Hood
11:37 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Frank... Are you seroius? Two short press conferences and the bobble head Chihua couldn't answer one question? Can you say EMBARRASSING! Does the Wizard behind the curtain have another 40+ million for another Obama Rumswab's run?
What's wrong with a General taking his eyes off Benghazi for a little loving?!?
Emcee of Seekonk
12:47 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
"...I am so baffled that Scott Brown was not reelected."
In Massachusetts where tyranny of the majority rules, it isn't the qualifications of a person that count, it is how they will vote once they are in Washington. Scott Brown could probably run as an Independent and caucus with the Republicans if ever he wants to make another bid at getting elected. Not sure if it would make any difference, though.
One thing is certain, that no matter what he decided to call himself, I would vote for him in any capacity.
Alan Wartenberg MD
1:39 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
The gridlock in Washington was TOTALLY COMPLETELY AND ABSOLUTELY ONLY because of intransigence in the Republican party. The tea-party folks, and their constituents, so cowed the leadership of the party that it moved far to the right, spending 2 years obstructing EVERYTHING the administration tried to do. Having a "bipartisan" Senator Brown meant nothing. The fact that Brown ran as a Republican while not even mentioning his party affiliation, refusing to censure his colleagues on their radicalism, and that he voted with his leadership some 75% of the time does not impress me. His sinking into the gutter in his ads (which he did first and in spades) also does not speak well of his character. I am baffled that you are baffled. What we need is to take back the House, and throw the tea-party whack jobs out, getting back moderate and sensible Republicans who remember what the business of governing is about. That process already started, kicking some 10 of them out of the House on this round. Round 2 - 2014.
Heather
11:03 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Oh yeah, have the dems take back the House. Then we could have a one party government. With the party that you want of course. The people of this country made it clear that they wanted a balance of power when they voted in a Republican House. Having a single party rule brings nothing but disaster.
Bill Darcey
2:01 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
wow , so we can spend money on another special election so scott brown can have a seat and lose it in a real election .
Indiana
2:09 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Ok Alan - explain how there are now 30 republican governors across the this great land. OWS are the whack jobs
...go fight for free contraception - good grief
Justin Braga
2:13 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
I'm guessing Dr. Wartenberg does not view Senator-elect Warren to be as "radical" on her side as he views the tea-partiers on the other side?
And Mr. Darcy, your comment seems to suggest that a special election isn't a "real" election. I promise you it is. The state really did elect Scott Brown as their junior U.S. Senator and I was proud of this Commonwealth for being able to look beyond the letter next to the name for once in doing so. If you are truly concerned about money spent on a special election, I would recommend you write a letter to President Obama asking him not to court John Kerry for a position in his new cabinet, or write a letter to Senator Kerry urging him to remain the senior senator here in Massachusetts. Then there would be no need for a special election.
Mark Minsky
2:18 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
No Rublican will run. It would be a waste of time and money.
Massachusetts has spoken cleary- Democrats only. If a Kennedy declares, it will an uncontested race.
Ken Tenglin
4:04 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
John Kerry for SOD????? The guy who threw away metals in protest that belonged to someone else????? The guy who was ashamed of his military service????? Are you kidding me???? What a joke. If he gets this position it will be a slap in the face to all that have and will serve in our military. Another fine choice it will be by our joke of a President. Maybe Scott Brown could run as a Dem in the special election to assure his victory in this state of blue sheep.
Avon Barksdale
4:24 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Yes, the guy who "threw away metals." This is delicious revenge for appointing James Watt to head the EPA and Clarence Thomas to ... well, to do anything having to do with America.
Avon Barksdale
4:26 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Sorry, Watt was the Secretary of The Interior who hated the interior, not the head of the EPA who hated the environment. That was some other right-wing extremist.
Ken B.
9:24 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Well, we already have Tax Cheat Timmy overseeing the IRS as Treasury Secretary, so why not ? It suits Obama's agenda.
Daniel F. Devine
9:33 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Don't forget another "sterling member" of Obama's Cabinet the Nations Top Law Enforcement Official, Attorney General Eric Holder., Obama needs Holder to carry out his highly progressive agenda by manipulating the law under the guise of false "justice"
Gretchen Robinson
6:53 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
did you go out and get your gun license and gun yet? I hear there's a run on the gun shops. "Obama's gonna take away our guns" paranoid Republicans have been saying for 4 years and it hasn't happened.
What else is Obama supposed to do when Bush messes up the Economy. What a screw up. I grant you he went for idiots like Lawrence Summers but someone had to hold the country together with our near Great Depression.
Indiana
10:47 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
@ both Ken's...this is what we are left with - the most FU administration of all time. it is crazy...Benghazzi is a mess - Petraus is a mess - but the nitwits want free birth control - priorities you know. Does not matter anymore - Barry has carte blanche - GOD help us all
Avon Barksdale
11:13 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Your comments are consistently silly.
Indiana
11:23 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
And we are consistently intrigued by your intellect Commrade
Avon Barksdale
11:43 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
It's just strange, I never understand the motivations of people like yourself, you seem reasonably able to form sentences yet you are content to just repeat the same themes, over and over and over in attempts to do nothing but agitate. In most cases, you're not even responding to something that someone else has said, it's just thrown out there as anger bait. I don't get that, I think most people don't. And I certainly don't think you've ever changed anyone's mind about anything, I mean just look at what you posted above - that's just a sub-literate screed. Who would listen to that - even people who agree with you - I have no idea.
Gretchen Robinson
6:54 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
being scared of the Commies is so 1950. The world has moved on, don't you know.
Carol Bragg
11:29 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Sen Jack Reed would make a better Secretary of Defense. He's the only West Point graduate in the U.S. Senate and is incredibly knowledgeable about military affairs. A fine gentleman who had serious reservations about what Donald Rumsfeld was doing to the military, especially the Army. Jack, by the way, is a former Army Ranger and explains that the speed with which he goes through the halls of Congress is from his days as a Captain leading his troops. He's a man of great humility -- something important in that post.
Gretchen Robinson
6:58 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I'll have to learn more about Sen. Jack Reed. He sounds solid. And 'humility'--that's enough to recommend him to my mind.
I do not want Massachusetts to go through another Senate race. This one was bruising and as it is many Republicans in this state are going nuts over Romney and Brown losing. The hate and rage I'm hearing doesn't seem to be abating. Plus Elizabeth Warren needs a senior senator to mentor her into her first term.
Carol Bragg
11:30 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
In other words, let Rhode island do the special election.
Darren Major
6:12 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
I have to agree - Kerry and Patrick need to stay until terms have ended - I see no reason people should turn around and vote Scott Brown back in but there are too many folks who continue to buy his bogus "bipartisan independent" acting scam - even after seeing that he is a very bad person in reality.
Carol Bragg
11:36 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Governor Chafee, who was a terrific U.S. Senator but was ousted because he wouldn't change from Republican to Independent, could appoint himself as U.S. Senator. He ran as an Independent for Governor. He would be good at building bridges (in the Senate, not literally). As a former horse handler, he's seen a lot of the backsides of horses, if you get my meaning. It's late and I really didn't write that.
R. Hood
7:55 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Carol... You obviously know nothing about Governor Chaffee. He has been abosolutey horendous (I'm being kind and he is not his Father!) since being elected with only 36% of the vote. His 6 hour days are filled with putting shovels in the dirt, attending functions and periodic internal meetings. All of which the media is not welcome to attend. To top it off his underage son and friends were caught drinking at one of the Gov's house parties. The guy is a complete embarassment to the State of RI. Please do your homework fo now on!
Carol Bragg
12:58 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
R. Hood: I didn't say Chafee was a good Governor. I said he was a terrific U.S. Senator. I thought Romney was a fairly good Governor. That doesn't mean I thought he'd be a good President. These positions require different skills. And we can't bring down everyone who's involved in something we consider wrong, or whose children do something wrong. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, Commander of the Allied forces in Europe, had a mistress. Should he have been brought down, risking the war effort, and also not served as President? We've gone nuts.
Mark Minsky
5:24 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Getting elected in Massachusetts has nothing to do with qualifications or building bridges. Voters who think like Avon are now in the majority: all democrats are good, all republicans are bad. End of discussion.
Avon Barksdale
7:32 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Apparently reading comprehension isn't Mark's strong suit, but let's not let that get in the way. He's right, Republicans never get elected in Massachusetts, unless you're part of the Bill Weld-Paul Cellucci-Jane Swift-Mitt Romney that held the governor's office for 16 consecutive years. Or Scott Brown, who defeated a very popular Attorney General for the seat held by a Kennedy for a generation.
Of course this state has many more Democrats than Republicans, but the problem is amplified by the utter incompetence of the state GOP and the inability of the national party to veer from its hard-line messaging during statewide elections. The state GOP produces weak candidates of zero substance, has no infrastructure, and succeeds in attracting only a strident base. They had the opportunity to capitalize on a VERY popular candidate in Brown, and possibly ride his coattails to some additional state seats and a congressional victory or two. And what did they do? The Brown campaign went HUGE negative, alienating swing voters. And Brown barely campaigned with anyone else, leaving people like Sean Bielat and Richard Tisei all alone in their fights. The result? A big fat donut hole, a huge zero for the GOP. And now folks like Mark are going to sit around and whine about how liberal the state is and how everything is rigged and the dummies here vote against balance blah blah blah. So much easier than blaming yourselves and the incompetence you've embraced.
deb of see-attleboro
10:05 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I could not agree more, Avon. I swore off democrats this time.
But when election day arrived I had to hold my nose and vote for Scott Brown. I even think his own party would be happy to be rid of him. He blew it in a big way. I would not be surprised if he followed Chafee and became an independent.
Avon Barksdale
10:28 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Dear Rabid Patchies,
Please look at what Deb and I are doing - it's called having a nuanced conversation where people with divergent views find common ground. I know, crazy, right?
Gretchen Robinson
7:03 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
nix the black and white thinking....people tell me they vote for the candidate. They knew not to fall for Scott Brown's faux 'bipartisan' stance and his 'stealth candidate' position as prochoice. Voters can suss out a pretender.
Trot Nixon
6:10 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
@ Indiana...keep regurgetating the right wing conspiracy theories...it clearly helped your party in the last election. Biggest FU administration?...were you asleep during W's presidency?
If Brown was smart...he'd run for Gov in 2014. Bc if he runs for Senate he'd be up again for re-election in 2014...4 senate campaigns in 4 years...idc who you are thats a tough road ahead. In all honesty though, he should run as an Independant instead of GOP. Clearly the nationally brand killed his re-election chances...the GOP in Mass is dead for a long time...
R. Hood
8:45 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
This current Administartion will surpass Carter's as the biggest FU of all time!
Darren Major
6:18 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Why promote a bad Senator to be our Governor? Makes no sense - Brown's act has really fooled a lot of people but Brown doesn't have the skill sets I want to see in a skilled Governor - i suspect he would slow otr stop the states progress which has been pretty decent in a bad economy + we are still #1 in Education! - NO to Brown for Governor
Indiana
8:15 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I did not vote for W the second time...Please tell me what Obama is doing for the good of US? One thing
Avon Barksdale
8:42 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Why? Even if somebody says something legitimate, you're just going to reflexively state that it's bullcrap and tell that person what a dumb dupe they are. Oh, and laugh maniacally.
Darren Major
6:21 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Your posts and desire to start fights belay your real interest in a discussion - we just had an election and tons of information - If you have no idea at this point - nothing can help you - you can go to his website - but you knew that
Ken Tenglin
9:01 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
@Avon "this is delicious revenge"? Are you serious, you obviously care nothing about this country if this is your thought process. Our "President" should look to appoint competent people to oversee these important positions, not seek "delicious revenge". Wake up, grow up and start to think like an adult instead of a vengeful child.
Avon Barksdale
9:14 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
"Are you serious"
No.
Yeesh, less coffee bro.
Janet Sroczynski
9:38 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Illinois - "the Deadbeat State" as depicted on "60 Minutes" last night. Video with audio link at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7166293n
Catch the full segment that aired with Meredith Whitney; Wall Street.
Illinois: Dan Hines; unable to pay its bills.
ISDA-The International Swaps & Derivatives Association; Robert Pickle-CEO.
Barach Obama - former Senator from Illiniois from 1999-2004.
Darren Major
6:24 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
One senator can't be held responsible for the entire state's - issue - your desperation to attack the President is really pathetic
Don't be a skeeter - http://snd.sc/ZPlFK8
Janet Sroczynski
10:04 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Illinois - "the Deadbeat State" -60 Minutes segment/cont'd: Read further on Daniel W. Hynes; Illinois State Comptroller at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Hynes
http://www.kmov.com/news/mobile/60-minutes-Illinois-is-a-deadbeat-state-112176809.html
University of Illinois is owed $400 million. Read the full article above for further details.
Indiana
12:05 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Independent voter is the way to go...the GOP obviously are losing their way and this president can do no wrong according to all his admirers.
Emcee of Seekonk
12:33 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
"...the GOP obviously are losing their way..."
No they're not. The chances of unseating an incumbent are always quite slim. In the 2016 election, the playing field will be even. Both sides need to have a primary and their won't be sitting president with a bully pulpit advantage. The reality is the Republicans did extremely well, all considered.
Don't give up on the Republicans... they are alive and well and the Independents are there to bolster their numbers.
paul
12:48 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The GOP base is an elite club of rich, old, white men. They will never win another major election again unless they do something (immigration compromise) to improve their appeal. They also should never talk about abortion or rape again, but we all know they just can't help it. Right now they are lost without a plan or leader.
Emcee of Seekonk
1:15 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Do you have an opinion on Marco Rubio? Tell me, is he white or a little tan... or maybe just a little brownish in the summertime. Melanin can be so quirky.
Is Rubio wealthy? Is he old? Would he have a chance to win against someone like Rahm Emanuel? Deval Patrick? Hillary Clinton?
I agree with you that the Santorums and Mourdocks and Akins have to go. They are too extreme. But it seems to me that the subject of abortion and contraception was what the DNC was all about. Women should vote with their body parts, to paraphrase Obama. The appeal of Conservatives to some 48% of the electorate in this past election is their stance on social issues. Why would they change that?
Trust me when I say the GOP is alive and well. Incumbents are difficult to unseat. It's that old devil-you-know-is-better-than-the-devil-you-don't-know syndrome. It will be a fairer election in 2016.
Indiana
1:34 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Well the only reason Obama is where he is - is his skin color...I love Rubio and he is a bright young repub - I really think the repubs need to loosen up a lot socially
Emcee of Seekonk
2:37 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I'm quite sure the reason Hillary was kicked to the curb by the Dems is because they felt they had a winner in an African American. Built-in race card, youth, etc. I mean, in the primaries, the Dems were calling the Clintons racists.
I agree, the Republicans need to learn how to fight the dirty fight, but they don't have to become just like Democrats.
deb of see-attleboro
1:54 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I would like to be as optimistic as you, Emcee. GOP needs a makeover. The Democrat's shamelessly campaign not only on college campuses but at high schools, as well. Didn't Obama do a number of personal and/or virtual appearances on high school campuses? Progressive/liberal fingerprints are all over the government school system. I recently heard Argentina lowered it's voting age to 16. Good possibility we are heading in that direction. I think we should go in the other direction. 21 sounds like a good age to vote AND to enlist in the military.
paul
2:50 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Emcee, Republicans need to learn how to fight dirty? Why do you think they lost? Why do you think Scott Brown lost? People are sick of dirty politics! The GOP is so out of touch, Spanish Voters and any girl with half a brain will not vote for them. They have no leadership or direction. Scott Brown was a flash in the pan. If the Kerry seat opens up Romney would have a better shot than Brown.
Emcee of Seekonk
2:58 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I believe the GOP is looking at itself and I hope they realize that they have to become more moderate. As for liberals, they have been on college campuses for years and years dating back to the peace movement and Woodstock, yet just about every other election cycle, a Republican gets elected for a couple of terms.
Good luck to Argentina. Prior to the 70's, I think the voting age in the US was 21. Then there was the outcry that if young men could be drafted at 18, they should have the right to vote at 18 as well. I agree that 21 is a good voting age.
deb of see-attleboro
3:49 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Not so sure moderate is the answer. If they want the youth vote, libertarian is the way to go. The kids love "crazy old" Ron Paul!
Emcee of Seekonk
3:14 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
@paul... "People are sick of dirty politics"
I certainly hope so, because I know I am. Everything you say pertains to Massachusetts and the Massachusetts message. Scott Brown will probably never get elected in Massachusetts again. But always remember, Obama/Dems won (with an incumbent) by just 50.5%. A very small margin for an incumbent because they usually win big. That leaves nearly 50% of the U. S. electorate who are not Dems. They may not be all Republicans, but they vote against Dems nonetheless.
I have resigned to Massachusetts politics long ago, and I really don't care who takes John Kerry's seat. Quite frankly I will be thankful to Obama if he takes Kerry off our hands because I really don't know what he has ever done for our state. Ted Kennedy brought home the bacon, and was a good senator for Massachusetts. But John Kerry... I'm not too sure. Maybe Massachusetts can enlist Joe Kennedy's twin brother for the job. He must have the necessary qualifications.
Jonathan Friedman
5:43 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
A post was deleted and the user's account was suspended for violating terms of use. Let's remember to attack the issues, not others who post on this site. Thank you.
Gretchen Robinson
7:14 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
what I'm seeing is Republicans stuck in their rage and frustration, irrationally going out and buying guns and attacking family members that voted liberal (3 families I know of, personally). I agree that Republicans need to stop and reflect, but the ability to reflect seems to be lacking in both parties. Only a good loss leads a party to reflect and come back stronger. The Democrats were able to do it after Bush II and now the onus is on Republicans.
Republicans knew that Hispanics are growing in numbers. Whey didn't they act sooner to ease up on immigration? Why didn't they learn how to moderate their stances to appeal to Asians? No, they went off on their hobbyhorse of hating gays, immigrants, minorities, women, and the 47% (Which included active duty soldiers).
Did it have to take a loss for them to wake up? And when are so many going to get off their pity pot and start acting like responsible adults who know how to deal with losses?
Anonymous
9:19 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
What is the problems with voters who are under 21? Is it perhaps because they are one of the largest sectors of Democratic supporters?I hardly find think that's a reason to count out these voters. The 18-21 voters are as well educated (or uneducated, shall we say) as every other voting group. So, what's the problem?
Telling it like it is
9:42 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
"You Rang" Senator Lurch reporting for duty. I hated the military , before I liked the military. And by the way "this tunnel will be a bargain", unless of coarse it kills more people. Then I'll change my mind.....AGAIN!
Indiana
10:08 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
It is sad when the USA supports countries that will not allow illegals in their countries...and these countries excersise cruel punishment for illegals - YET when these illegals enter our country illegally it is a love fest...Huh?? is this right?? I cannot imagine ANY american thinking this is fair.
Gretchen Robinson
10:42 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Republicans lost because they vilified Blacks, Hispanics, minorities, women's issues, and even immigrants and now your pushing the same. There is a tendency to keep on doing what you've always done. But then you're gonna get what you've always gotten. Guess you want Republican want to keep loosing????
You may not know but there are Republican leaders who want to win elections and have good ideas for doing it (be less extreme, listen to some moderates within the party). Time to turn Rush Limbaugh and O'Reilly off and get your brain out of the gutter, while it's still capable of thinking your way through this. We democrats don't hate republicans, we abhor your tactics and the lies you tell yourselves. Act sane and maybe we can talk.
Rabblerouser
11:27 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Will it be Jo,Jo,Jo K? He has a problem putting down roots anywhere and has zilch for qualifications to be a congressman so he might as well reach for the brass ring and go for the Senate.
Nothing like running for city council in Brookline or selectman down the cape first to get his feet wet in the political process. No, Not for a lad with a last name like Kennedy in a state where the sheeple would still vote in a dead Kennedy if one's name were on a ballot.
Kool-Aid, anyone?
Gretchen Robinson
11:40 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Rabble, your ignorance is showing. Check the news will ya'
Amy
8:55 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Yay! We finally have the chance to get Kerry out of Massachusetts!
Emcee of Seekonk
9:08 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
LOL... Time to get that rich old white man OUT !!
paul
9:31 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Kerry may move on but the Democrats are here to stay!
Indiana
9:45 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
All I ask is that illegals play by the rules - oh dems do not play that way. Gimme Gimme Gimme some more -
paul
10:17 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Illegals are playing by the rules in the game that we made for them. Illegals are not a party problem they are a National one. No one likes ticks and parasites. Democrats are not to blame for every welfare program gone wild. Everything government always goes broke like the post office, it's the American way. We all get that you are a Republican from Indiana and hate Democrats but that is why the GOP lost by a landslide at every level (hatred). Minorities and females fear Republicans because they are angry, just like you!
Emcee of Seekonk
10:46 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
"...GOP lost by a landslide..."
48 to 50 is not a landslide and 50% is not a mandate. There might not have been too many minorities in the 48% (59 million + voters), but there were a lot of woman. Married women. Women who value family values.
Indiana
11:01 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
30 republican governors is not a landslide...democrats might not be fully to blame but how many democrat presidents have sued a state for upholding the Constitution?? It is all about votes for the democrats
Emcee of Seekonk
11:13 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
"30 republican governors is not a landslide"
No, but it is a majority. 3/5 of the states in the union are governed by Republicans. In short, Republicans still have a lot of influence in the US. Democrats dominate in the northeast (New England, NY, et al), but when you look at the big picture, the politics are pretty well evenly divided.
Indiana
11:03 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Sorry - democrats might not be fully to blame but how many republican presidents have sued a state for upholding the Constitution??
Indiana
11:42 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Sorry Emcee - meant to say that was a landslide
paul
11:45 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Family values, like religion should not be a political matter. Most people have their own ideas of what family is and don't want the government shoving it down their necks. Republicans want it their way or no way. If they don't learn to compromise they will become extinct no matter how many governors they have.
Indiana
12:34 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Most people do not want the government shoving anything down their necks.Why get a job if they can get 35-40k a year from the government. 60% of americans get more $ from the government than they pay in taxes - some deservingly so
Emcee of Seekonk
12:50 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
"...60% of americans get more $ from the government than they pay in taxes..."
And we all know that's got to stop. Cuts in entitlements are on their way. Otherwise, we'll all be rioting in the streets like Greece... and that might come, yet.
Gretchen Robinson
12:40 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
give up, Indiana. No one is listening anymore. Find some new gripes, ah, talking points.
Jonathan Friedman
2:14 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Gretchen, please do not encourage people not to post on the site. It is good to have a variety of opinions featured in these threads. Otherwise, it would be very boring.
Avon Barksdale
2:40 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Jonathan, please do not discourage Gretchen from posting comments requesting that people not post. Eliminating Gretchen's posts about not posting will reduce the number of comments here and limit the perspectives on display. Nobody wants that, it's boring.
Emcee of Seekonk
12:41 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
In the last election, conservative values appear to have been important to about 59+ million people. Either that, or they were strictly voting against Obama... that could be, too. Among the 59 million were Christians of all stripes, Jews, Muslims, Athiests, Agnostics, Hindu, Buddhists and what have you. Each with their own set of values. It is hard to believe that all those people would suddenly become godless Democrats. There will always be an alternate party to the Democrats, whether it be called Republican or Libertarian or Green or etc., etc., etc..
deb of see-attleboro
2:43 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
A note on "family values". Like you, paul, I don't want someone elses values shoved down my throat. However, government FOREVER has rewarded and/or punished certain lifestyle choices and economic decisions through our tax codes. I had hope when Obama stated govenment should "cut spending through the tax code" he would at least try to make it happen. On the face of it, the statement sounds pretty stupid. It would have made more sense if he said let's make the tax code non-discriminatory. In other words FAIR. But, whatever.
IMO, raising taxes on the top 2% is meaningless. It does not address the root cause of my disgust with both party's.
Amy
3:05 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
30 Stupid things the U.S. government is spending money on: paying researchers to play video games, paying researchers to study the effects of cocaine on Japanese quail and it has spent millions of dollars to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly. So, now we all understand why we need to raise taxes. Geez, what's wrong with you guys!
Carol Bragg
5:00 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
31st stupid thing: Read 20,000 to 30,000 pages of e-mails sent from a U.S. general to a Tampa socialite to see whether they are inappropriate. We're paying tax dollars to embarrass the nation internationally.
Indiana
3:45 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Now back to Gretchen Maddow and Avon Matthews in the booth...don't forget to tip your waiters and waitresses
Amy
9:18 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Carol, we've moved on from Bill Clintons escapades. Lets focus. General Petraues decided to do the right thing and tell the truth about 4 dead Americans that were murdered. I wish the President would be as emotional about their murder as the fake anger for his liar of the moment, Susan Rice. Now, some quotes from John Kerry, potentially the next person responsible for sending our kids to war: 1. Go to school or you'll end up fighting in Iraq. 2. Vietnam Vets were rapists and murderers. 3. I threw my medals away but not my ribbons (still hanging in his office). What an upstanding man. so, hopefully he will leave Massachusetts and the entire country can share him. Now, for stupid spending lesson of the day: $765,828 to subsidize "pancakes for yuppies" in the nation's capital.
Just Saying
4:32 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Let's focus. The question is, "Who Will Run for Kerry's Seat if He's Appointed Secretary of Defense?".
Amy
4:35 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Just Saying-It's very easy to get off topic as you've noted.
Brian Hutchinson
4:58 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
I would like to see Paul Heroux run vs Former Rep Ross.
Jonathan Friedman
8:09 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012
LOL
Ken B.
4:24 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Though the appointment is Secretary of State, looks like we'll find out soon.
Jerry Chase
12:34 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
The results of 2012 proved that those who work for a living are now out-voted by those who vote for a living.
Emcee of Seekonk
12:43 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
LOL. That's a good one.
Gretchen Robinson
4:38 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Jerry/Emcee, that's your opinion. I presume you are still in the land of the recent election which Romney lost for many reasons, but most immediately for the 47% comments. And the language of 'takers' and 'makers' which I found highly insulting to the middle class.
The 47% nonsense was debunked royally. Why are you even starting again with this stuff which proved fatal to Romney/Ryan's campaign.
Say did you See Doonesbury comic Sunday?
"When Dems retire, like Carter, Clinton, and Gore, they remain engaged as global citizens" says the bearded Rev. Scot. "But when Republicans exit, like Ford, Reagan, Bush and Dubya, they're all about corporate speeches and golf!"
There you have it, folks, the difference between the parties.
Amy
7:31 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Al Gorezeera has been making money hand over fist from oil and fake global warming. I'm sure you've seen him fly his private jet all over the place. Another reminder George W. Bush saved around 10 million lives with his work against AIDs in Africa, please do the research Gretchen. I'm leaving soon to go skiing.
Bush became the co-founder of the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, a charity focused on ‘building back better’ after the devastation of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Bush also helps charities closer to home. He was the chairman of Hearts and Hammers; a Dallas based charity, designed to rehabilitate the houses of Dallas’ elderly residents that enabled them to live independently. Bush never critized Obama because it would have been classless. Some people don't need the limelight. Please send that memo to Clinton?
Fiscal Conservative
7:55 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Republican or Democrat, does it make any difference who runs? Honest people no longer choose to run because of the humiliation that media presents in covering those they don't want in office. Honest candidates would never place their families through the BS that is thrown out there. Therefore, we're all stuck with what is remaining...the dishonest, out to see what they can get for themselves. By the way, today the president got a kick in the old ...... when the Appeals Court said he violated the CONSTITUTION. It was a Unanimous decision!!! Sometimes, even the person who thinks he can do as he pleases, is wrong. So, he now joins my ranks, those who are not perfect (by the way, I don't have enough fingers & toes to count the number of times I've been wrong. I admit my mistakes, he'll just blame some one else other than him. That's his track record.).